Faith, Health and Happiness

You can’t open an internet site without a pop-up ad promising you some product or practice that will improve your memory, libido, relationships, or business practices. Go to Barnes and Noble and check out the “self-help” section. The shelves groan with books on meditation, macro-biotic diets, anger management, and embracing the inner child. If we did every practice that only took “ten minutes a day,” we would never get anything done, but we would be healthier, happier and more fulfilled.

But more often than not, this isn’t the case. Not that picking up a positive habit isn’t a good thing, but why aren’t we feeling better if we’re getting better? One reason we don’t know how to feel good is that so little work has been done to discover the sources and influences that actually do make us feel good and positive about life. Psychologists David G. Myers and Ed Diener pointed out this dearth of research in a study they called “The Science of Happiness.”

After surveying decades of Psychological Abstracts they found 5,119 articles that address anger; anxiety is mentioned 38,459 times, depression 48,366 times. But happiness? Only 1,710 mentions. Life satisfaction? Only 2,357 mentions. Joy? Only 402 mentions. This amounts to a 21 to 1 ratio of negative to positive emotions studied by our scientists. Jung successor and Jungian analyst James Hillman asks the question, “Why do we focus so intensely on our problems?” and then answers it: “Somehow we desire our problems; we are in love with them as much as we want to get rid of them.”

By now researchers have asked a huge sampling of the human race — more than a million people — what makes life satisfying. The results are in. And we now have some predictors of joy and life satisfaction.

Surprisingly, there is virtually no relationship between income and happiness. The richest Americans (Forbes’ 100 wealthiest Americans) are negligibly happier than the average American. Similarly, there is little relationship between disabilities and happiness. Within four months of his paralyzing accident, Christopher Reeve reported “genuine joy in being alive.”

These authors did find five traits that characterize “happy” people:

1) “Positive self-image.” People who are content with life are confident about their abilities and embrace their gifts.

2) “Personal Control.” Upbeat people exert control over their lives. In theological language, people who are happier are more self-disciplined than people who aren’t.

3) “Optimistic.” A positive outlook on life and an openness to others is essential to good mental health.

4) “Extroverted.” In their use of this term, the authors are more concerned about the ability to achieve lasting relationships with others than about some personality style.

But the trait that correlated most closely with happiness was #5: “Faith.” Karl Marx got it as wrong as anyone could get it when he said religion was an opiate of the people. On the contrary, religion is a key stimulant to and ingredient in a happy life. In the words of their research, “Actively religious people are much less likely to become delinquent, to abuse drugs and alcohol, to divorce and to commit suicide. In Europe and North America, religiously active people also report greater happiness. In one Gallup Poll, highly spiritual people were twice as likely as those lowest in spiritual commitment to declare themselves very happy. Other surveys find that happiness and life satisfaction rise with strength of religious affiliation and frequency of worship attendance. One statistical digest of research among the elderly found that one of the best predictors of life satisfactions is religiousness.”

Even the so-called “hard sciences” are finding similar correlation’s between a commitment of faithfulness and the physical well-being of individuals. Studies have found that those individuals who profess a belief in God, who confess to an active faith relationship, are more generally healthy than those who don’t. Apparently, when believers do become injured or ill, they tend to heal faster, respond better to treatment, and generally get well more quickly and more often than those who disavow any active faith life.

So what does this mean? We should evangelize by promoting Jesus as a superior product that brings one health and happiness? Is religion merely functional? Our God is better than your God? We all know people who are a faithful, sincere believers who get cancer and suffer greatly. We also know people of no faith who seem pretty happy.

Nevertheless, there seems to be a definitive physiological relationship between health and faith. MRI scans reveal that those regions of the brain most active and responsive during healing processes are the same as those that are functioning at highest capacity when individuals are praying or involved in rituals of worship. Scientists theorize that the brains of those who are actively faithful are thus physiologically “wired” for healing — that portion of the brain that flexes in faith practices also helps us back to health.

We can all testify to the peace we can experience when circumstances dictate otherwise because we trust in a Sovereign God. We all know that gratitude and a positive attitude can get us through an illness with more aplomb. We have experienced answered prayer even after years of petitioning God. Faith isn’t like a nickel you put into a gum ball machine which dispenses goodies. Faith is trust in the mercy of God and that makes all the difference.

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Does Counting Your Blessings Really Help?

How often do you take time to reflect on the things you’re grateful for? Once a month? Once a week, at church, perhaps? Maybe you say “grace” at mealtime every day. But even prayers that do express gratefulness are often expressed by rote. Have you ever heard this prayer at Thanksgiving?

“Blessusolordforthesethygiftswhichweareabouttoreceivefromthybounty.”

Last week I spoke of studies that showed a correlation between health and those who had an active faith. Now I’ve discovered that there is also experimental research showing that gratitude correlates with positive emotions such as happiness, pride, and hope, but experimental work — showing that gratitude causes these things — is scarcer.

Researchers and Psychologists Robert Emmons and Michael McCullough figured it would be interesting to create an experiement to measure the effects of gratitude. They researched college students studying health psychology and divided the students into three groups. The first group listed five things they were grateful for each week. The second group listed five hassles or irritants from the past week. The final group simply wrote down five “events or circumstances” from the past week. This continued for ten weeks. What sort of things did they write?

Some students said they were grateful for “waking up this morning,” or “for wonderful parents,” or “the Lord for just another day.” Hassles were things like “hard to find parking,” “messy kitchen,” or “having a horrible test in health psychology.”

As you might expect, the students in the gratefulness group scored significantly higher than the hassles group on the gratefulness measure. But they also were more positive about the upcoming week and their life as a whole. But on the more rigorous measure of the positive, long term emotional effects of the exercise there was no significant difference between the groups.

Emmons and McCullough suspected the reason positive differences weren’t observed was that the respondents only reflected on things they were grateful for once a week. So they repeated the study on two different groups: a new batch health psychology students and adults with neuromuscular diseases. This time the students completed their questionnaires daily for 13 days and 21 days for the NMD patients. In each of these studies, there was a significant improvement in positive affect. The reason the researchers found was this: Just writing down the things you are grateful for each day appears to cause to improve your overall emotional outlook. In the NMD study, respondents in the gratitude group also reported getting significantly more sleep and feeling more refreshed when they woke up in the morning.

The researchers speculate that simply enumerating things you are grateful for might be a treatment for mild forms of depression. They certainly seem to have confirmed the worth of the “count your blessings” regularly. Perhaps simple gratitude is one of the keys to a healthier, happier life. It also confirms why the Christian faith continues to endure: because we have a God worthy of our gratitude.

Count your blessings, name them one by one,
Count your blessings, see what God has done!
Count your blessings, name them one by one,
Count your many blessings, see what God has done.

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Signs of Resurrection: “To End the Anguish, Drop the Death Penalty”

Like me, you may have read the letter to the Boston Globe by Bill and Denise Richard’s, the parents who lost their little boy Martin to the Boston Marathon bombing two years ago. They appealed to the prosecution team of Jahar Tsarnaev, “To end the anguish, drop the death penalty.” They argue that giving Tsarnaev the death penalty would keep his story and face in the news for years to come during the appeal process. The wounds of his victims would never heal as they had to relive that day whenever his face or name was in the news. It is a more fitting and servere punishment to lock him up without parole for the rest of his life to reflect on the heinousness of his crime and to be outside of the limelight of the media.

The Richard’s are people of faith. They are Roman Catholic and active in their parish. Catholic social teaching, as is most Christian teaching, is against the death penalty. I don’t know if that influenced them to write their appeal in that letter, but it is still pretty amazing. For a family who suffered the loss of their sweet little 8 year old, Bill Richard’s is still recovering from a blown ear drum, Denise is adjusting to the loss of her right eye from the blast, their 7 year old daughter Jane lost her left leg, and Henry, their other son, missed schrapnel but witnessed the whole horror show, it is staggering that they are not calling for revenge.

They aren’t at a point of forgiveness, if they every will be, nor are they diminishing the heinousness of the crime, but they are saying that justice isn’t served by taking a life for a life. During his life time Jesus opposed retributive justice by overturning the Old Testament teaching of “an eye for an eye.” “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well.If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles.Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.” Matthew 5:38-42

In fact, during his ministry, Jesus publicly thwarted an execution. When the woman caught in adultery was about to be stoned he stopped it and he said: “He who is without sin may cast the first stone.” The fact that Jesus stopped an execution is completely in line with all of his other prohibitions against the use of violence. When Jesus said “he who is without sin may cast the first stone” he was teaching that while death may seem just, and even at times be just, there isn’t anyone alive who is worthy to tie the noose around their neck. Therefore, even if siding with the rationale that death is a just punishment in some cases, we arrive at the difficult truth that — according to Jesus — neither you or I are perfect enough to serve in the role of executioner.

Jesus further teaches that it is better to show mercy and compassion than to obey the law. One of the areas where he got himself in trouble more than once (and the act that likely helped lead to his death) was appearing to violate the law against working on the Sabbath. During one of these occasions, Jesus and his disciples were plucking grain (work) because they were hungry. When confronted for violating the law, Jesus replied: “If you had known what these words mean, ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent.” Matthew 12:7  In a variety of circumstances, we see that God values mercy and compassion above all else — which means we should be people who value mercy above all else. After all, mercy seems to be God’s love language.

Yes, the issue of capital punishment is a complex one, and people of goodwill can disagree.  While this can be a complex debate if speaking only from our identities as American citizens, this issue should not be as complex for Jesus followers. Jesus overturned the old laws that permitted the use of retributive (and all other forms) of violence. It simply is not possible to simultaneously follow the one who forbade violence while participating, condoning, or supporting it in any form.

My point, ultimately, is that the appeal of the Richard’s family to “Drop the Death Penalty” is a sign of Resurrection faith and Resurrection life. They asked for mercy not revenge and for justice that was not retributive. As Jesus’ Resurrection was a blow against the use of violence to get rid of outcasts and rabble rousers (the victim became the victor) so is the Richard’s appeal to our better natures a refusal to participate in a world where violence is seen as redemptive and revenge is normative.

Posted in Blogs | Leave a comment

Still We Rise

For the next 50 days we will be in the season of Easter. And you thought Easter was over after we all went home from a fabulous Easter service and had our Easter dinner. No, resurrection is just beginning! It’s interesting to note that the Easter season is longer than Lent by ten days. Maybe that’s to remind us that life is stronger than death, love is stronger than hate, and forgiveness is stronger than revenge. While it’s important to acknowledge the seriousness of sin in our lives and our world, it’s more important to experience life and the power of the Risen Christ in our inmost being and in our world.

The late Maya Angelou, poet and person extraordinaire, wrote a beautiful poem called Still I Rise. It’s an amazing recitation of the resilience of the human spirit. Listen to her share it.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqOqo50LSZ0

Her poem reminds me of how many people we had given up for dead, but still they rise. I have a clergy colleague who was diagnosed with Stage 4 cancer on Good Friday three years ago. Against all odds, the tumors have begun to shrink and she’s still alive. We all have experienced death’s in our lives–the end of a relationship that we still can’t wrap our head’s around, the end of a job, good health, a bankruptcy, and dashed hopes and dreams. But still we rise.

This is the real message of Easter. It wasn’t just about the resurrection of Jesus, but it’s about our continuing resurrection. If resurrection is only about getting a voucher to enter heaven after we die, then what’s it got to do with today?  For me the “proof” of the resurrection, if you will, is when I see Christ alive in people of faith.

I have seen it in people who struggle to forgive even those who have done horrible things to them. I have seen it in people who have changed careers from simply making a living to making a life. I have seen it in couples who have worked through tough issues to rediscover love. I have seen it in communities that go to far away places to build houses, make bunk beds, and feed and shelter hungry people. That’s when resurrection shows up.

Yes, we all have faced death in one form or another, and we will all face it again. It is a nasty thing. Paul calls it the last enemy. It’s last because it doesn’t have the last say. As people of resurrection, we live our entire lives facing toward morning and the sunrise. Night may come, but, like the sun, still we rise. As St. Augustine put it, “We are Easter people and alleluia is our song!”

Posted in Blogs | Leave a comment

Friday’s here, but Sunday’s coming!

You don’t have to look far to see the world’s in a mess. A German pilot deliberately brings down a plane into the French alps and kills 150 innocent people due to his depression. Yemen is in shambles due to the civil war between Sunni and Shitte Muslims and sectarian tribes.

Yes, Good Friday is here, but Sunday’s coming.

In Boston we are following the murder trial of former New England Patriots tight end Aaron Hernandez rt as he faces a charge of murder for the killing of 26-year-old Odin Lloyd. We’re also following the Boston Marathon bombing trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

Yes, Good Friday is here, but Sunday’s coming.

Boston Police Officer John T. Moynihan approached a stopped vehicle last Friday, stood by the driver’s door, and taps on the edge of the roof to tell him to come out. As the driver, Angelo West, emerges, Moynihan shifts on his feet — and suddenly rears back as West shoots him in the face.

Yes, Good Friday is here, but Sunday’s coming.

You are called into your boss’s office and thanked for all your years of service, but the company is downsizing and he has to let you go. You get a call from your doctor. The biopsy came back positive. You come home from work and find a note that says your marriage has gone stale and she’s not coming back. Your kid has just bullied a child on the playground for the fifth time and you don’t know what to do.

Yes, Good Friday is here, but Sunday’s coming.

That’s the power of the Easter message. Yes, we live in a Good Friday world, but that’s not the end of the story. Against all odds and all expectations God raised Jesus from the tomb. He burst the bonds of death. He threw down a gauntlet on Easter day and said, “Enough! Enough death, enough injustice, enough suffering, enough violence!” In Christ, God has overcome all that besets us and promises life. Easter is the first stake in the ground that the kingdom of God has arrived. Hallelujah!

Posted in Blogs | Leave a comment

Forgiveness is a process.

During the Lenten season we often think about forgiveness–not only the forgiveness offered to us by God, but also those whom we need to forgive or those who need to forgive us. But anyone who’s been around the block of life more than once knows how difficult that can be. God may be able to forgive instantaneously, but human beings? Not so much.

Preachers often exhort their parishioners about the need to forgive and the Gospels have plenty to say about it, but they don’t tell us how. What I have learned over my life is that forgiveness in a process.

Lewis Smedes, late theologian and psychologist, wrote a marvelous book called Forgive and Forget: Healing the Hurts We Don’t Deserve. He talks about forgiveness as a four stage process.

FIRST, WE HURT

The first kind of hurt we face is personal pain. We can only forgive people, not nature, not systems–even though those can hurt us. People are the only ones who can be held accountable for what they do. People are the only ones who can accept forgiveness and decide to come back to us.  Then there is unfair pain. Forgiving is love’s remedy to be used when we are hurtfully wronged by a person we trusted to treat us right. There is pain and there is unfair pain. It hurts to lose $50 on a fair bet; it also hurts to be mugged on the street and robbed of $50.

SECOND, WE HATE

You might object that Christians shouldn’t hate or feel hatred. But we’re also human. Hate is our natural response to any deep and unfair pain. It’s our instinctive backlash against anyone who wound’s us wrongly. There are two kinds of hate: passive—not being able to wish a person well and active —we wish them ill. Regardless, it separates us from others and eats us alive. Hate is not anger. Anger means we’re alive and well. Hate means we’re sick and need to be healed. Anger wants to change things for the better; hate for the worse.

THIRD, WE HEAL OURSELVES

When you begin to forgive someone for hurting you, you perform spiritual surgery of the soul; you cut away the wrong done to you so that you can see your “enemy” through the magic eyes that can heal your soul. In doing so you begin to receive several gifts. The first gift we get is new insight. We see a deeper truth about them—they are weak, needy, fallible human beings, not ogres or monsters. They are not only people who hurt us; that is not the deepest truth about them. New insight always brings new feeling. When you forgive me, the wrong I did to you becomes irrelevant to how you feel about me now. The pain I once caused you has no connection with how you feel toward me now. How do you know that forgiveness has begun? When you recall those who hurt you and feel the power to wish them well.

LAST, WE COME TOGETHER

While there are some people with whom we should never try to reconcile (an abused child with her abusive father), the ideal is that we can come back together. If we ignore the wrong as if it did not really matter, we take our first step into an amoral life where nobody really gives a damn. Things will never be right between us if we ignore the wrong between us. It is what people do to us in spirit and space that hurts. The price of the journey to freedom and a renewed journey together includes:

truthfulness—they must understand the reality of what they did to hurt you, how it impacted you, and about your future together. Forgiving is not having to understand. Understanding may come later in fragments after forgiving. Human existence and human relationships are mysterious.

What we see here in this brief review is that forgiveness is possible, but it takes time. It’s just as complicated as human beings are. The anger, resentment, and lack of forgiveness is a cancer inside of us. But you know what? It’s eating us up not the one we need to forgive.

Posted in Blogs | Leave a comment

We all need a mulligan.

You may have heard about the man who woke up one day to discover his name printed in the obituary column. All day long people called to offer their sympathy to his family. Finally, in exasperation, the man called the newspaper to complain. They were quite apologetic, and the editor promised she would print a correction. Sure enough, the next day the man opened the paper and found his name printed in the birth announcements.

Wouldn’t it be nice to start over that easily?

In golf, if the game is casual and among friends, you might be allowed what is called a “mulligan” when you really mess up a shot. It means you get to take the shot over without penalty.

A mulligan is an act of grace in an otherwise unforgiving game. Think for just a moment about what area of your life, what event, what mistake for which you would like a mulligan. There is not one of us that doesn’t need a “do over,” a second, third, or fourth chance to get it right. Jesus comes to us offering forgiveness and abundant grace.

In their wonderful book If Grace is True, Quaker writers Philip Gulley and James Mulholland describe heaven as the place where we shall be seated at the table of grace between two distinct people. On one side will be seated the person we most need to forgive, and on the other the person from whom we most need forgiveness.

Most of us probably spend a lot more time thinking about the people who have hurt, betrayed or offended us that we need to forgive than people who need to forgive us. You probably have serveral people that you just can’t bring yourself to forgive. It takes courage and determination to let go of those wounds and hurt and ask God to give you the grace, courage and spiritual resources to release those folks.

But I wonder if we have the same courage and honesty to make a list of those who need to forgive us? I’ll bet we are not even aware of those we have hurt or offended.

Today, as we begin this fourth week of Lent, perhaps it would serve our spirits well to sit for a moment and ponder those who need to forgive us. That list may just humble us enough to open our lives to the redemption and transformation for which we all long.

Don’t let the cancer of regret and shame eat away your soul. There is a world out there that needs forgiveness. There are souls starving for the grace of God, and God has just the person to feed them. A prodigal, a mulligan, a saint like you.

Posted in Blogs | Leave a comment

Thinking About Lent, Sin and Grace

Lent is the season of reflection and introspection. People often associate lent with a time of focusing on sin—to the point of excoriating self-examination, leaving no stone unturned of what we have done or not done, said or not said. It often amounts to picking the scab of a wound that has already begun to heal.

While it is important that Christians take sin seriously, we should take growing in grace more seriously and make that the focus of our Lenten activities. If we focus on sin exclusively, we find ourselves in the same conundrum as St. Paul in Romans 7 that the harder he tries not to sin, the worse it get. What we focus on is grace and how we can grow in that. We will then discover, like St. Paul, that where grace abounds, sin cannot.
When Jesus healed the blind man he refused to entertain ideas about the origins of sin or whose sin caused the man to be born blind. (John 9: 1-5)

He focused instead on the grace of God that was to be manifested in the man’s healing. The traditional focus during Lent has often been on the commandments and how we have broken them, which just makes us experts on sin. The can be very demoralizing and not lead to a grace-filled life. Another approach might be to also reflect on the times when we have kept the commandments, or been a faithful follower of Christ. What enabled us to keep the commandments? How has that been a blessing in our lives and in the lives of our neighbors?

Jesus didn’t come that we might have less sin and death; he came that we might have life, and share it abundantly with our neighbors.
Repentance is about turning from one course of action to another. Repentance is fundamentally about making changes. There are three “Rs” of repentance that help us understand the mechanics of change and the elements that people need to consider when making changes.

  • Recognize: that we are doing something that we don’t want to. Without awareness we will never recognize our need to change.
  • Regret: Being conscious of the cost to other and ourselves of our actions. If we don’t truly regret our actions, we will not change.
  • Reorient: Turning from what we don’t want to what we do want. If we continue to focus our attention on what we don’t want we will persist in that behavior.

Failure to complete a desired change is usually the result of a failure of one of the repentance steps. The most important step is often the reorient step. Many of us can recognize and regret our undesired actions, but the harder we try to stop the undesired behavior the more we remain stuck, just as Paul reported in Romans 7. Staying focused on the undesired behavior prevents us from reorienting ourselves to the desired behavior. During Lent if we only focus on what we don’t want ourselves or our parishioners to be doing, we will ensure that they and we will keep doing them. What we must do is reorient ourselves and them to the call of the Good News.

Similarly, if the focus of Lent is self-denial and learning to say no, we will never discover the grace and the new life that Jesus comes to offer. What is truly life giving to you and your congregation? How can you and they orient your lives around that discovering often leading to genuine repentance?

Any “no” or act of self-denial in the spiritual life is only as helpful as the deeper “Yes” that the no allows. Easter is not just a positive, feel good experience. Easter is the life-giving “Yes!” from God that echoes through the universe.

Repentance is never defined in the NT. That is because it had such a powerful tradition in the prophets that its meaning was assumed of Jewish hearers. It is a graphic word picture drawn from the Hebrew word shub meaning to do an about face; to be going in one direction and to turn and go another. Spiritually speaking it means to turn from sin to god. “Conversion” really expresses the idea better than repentance. The Greek word for repentance, metanoia, suggests a change of mind or sorrow for sin. But the Hebrew idea of conversion involves turning around the whole person toward God. Conversion for the Jew meant turning to the law in obedience to the revealed will of God. It meant doing good works. In our Christian tradition we tend to think of conversion as a onetime event; something that happened back there at baptism or when I confessed Christ as savior and lord. But to be faithful to the meaning scripture carries, there should be many con¬versions in our lives, many turning points, many returns to god, into a deeper and fuller obedience.

Luke uses a curious expression in v.3 to de¬scribe john’s ministry as “preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins.” It’s curious because it could be interpreted two ways. You could see it as a repentance baptism, a ritualistic washing that some¬how results in your sins being for¬given. Or you could see it as a baptism which is the sign and symbol of the forgiveness of sins one experiences when he or she repents. That’s a big difference. The first is a form of superstition, magic so to speak, the second is a sign that you take sin seriously. The water does not make you clean. The water is but a symbol of the cleansing which must take place internally. God is always ready to for¬give, but until we repent, until we turn, we can’t experience that forgiveness.

In September of 1985, convicted killer Theodore Strzelecki was released from prison after having served seven years for the hammer slaying of a Stanford University professor. He had been a model prisoner in many ways. On three occasions prior to his release, he had been offered parole, but each time he rejected it because he was unwilling to accept its conditions. One condition was that he express some remorse for his crime and promise never to kill again. But Strzelecki said, I do not feel remorse. I have never felt remorse.” He couldn’t experience the benefits of pardon until he was willing to repent. The parole board was entirely willing, but Strzelecki wouldn’t accept the terms.

This is the negative side of repentance. This is turning from evil to avoid the judgment of god. And let me say, that God’s judgment is not like human judgment. It is not a cruel, exacting punishment that requires payment for every iota of wrong-doing. It is God’s pronouncement that sin, rebellion, self-pitying, evil, and apathy will not be tolerated. Our God is holy, perfect, and pure and is opposed to all that is contrary to loving, life-giving divine intentions.

But there is a positive side to repentance as well. The Messianic ruler will also baptize with the Holy Spirit which will produce the righteousness and prosperity, the justice and peace that will be normative in the messianic age. In order to prepare for that coming kingdom john warned, “Produce fruit in keeping with repentance.” In other words, walk your talk. Prove that what you say with your lips is true in your life.

Let me give you a contemporary illustration of this. When Michigan played Wisconsin in basketball early in the season in 1989, Michigan’s Rumeal Robinson stepped to the foul line for two shots late in the fourth quarter. His team trailed by one point, so Rumeal could regain the lead for Michigan. He missed both shots, allowing Wisconsin to upset favored Michigan. Rumeal felt awful about costing his team the game, but his sorrow didn’t stop at the emotional level. After each practice for the rest of the season, Rumeal shot 100 extra foul shots. Thus, Rumeal was ready when he stepped to the foul line to shoot two shots with three seconds left in overtime in the national¬ championship game. Swish went the first shot, and swish the second. Those shots won Michigan the national championship. Rumeal’s repentance had been genuine, and sorrow motivated him to work so that he would never make that mistake again. As Paul wrote, “Godly sorrow leads to repentance” (2 Cor. 7:10).

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

The Goal of Lent

Lent is a time of self-discipline and self-denial. We follow Jesus to the cross and Lent reminds us that there is a cross for us to bear as well.

Self-denial or cross-bearing isn’t a very hot selling idea.  I keep waiting for a magic pill that will keep me fit and trim, but I know by experience that only self-denial (like keeping track of my calories) and discipline (like keeping up my exercise routine) will keep me fit and healthy. So, why would we think it would be different with our spiritual and mental health?

There are no silver bullets. There were none for Jesus, and there are none for us. The road to Resurrection Life, then and now, goes by way of the cross. It feels better to:

  • Sleep late than it does to rise earlier, pray, read and meditate.
  • Buy that new iPhone than it does to tithe or give money to help those in need.
  • Stay home and watch TV, or read the paper and drink coffee than it does to get dressed and go to worship.

It is no accident that “discipline” and “disciple” are almost the same word. Abby is having our kids “train to be disciples” by having them keep track of daily spiritual disciplines. Hopefully it’s the beginning of a life-long habit. The disciplines, the crosses, of Lent have as their goal the new life that we call Easter. Easter is not the end of Lent; it is the GOAL of Lent. The Christian life is not to have less death, but more life! We live in a day obsessed with feeling good. If we have an ache or pain we take a pill. If diet or exercise don’t have immediate results we quit. If a relationship gets tough we walk away. We want Easter, but we don’t want Lent.

I recently heard about a teenage girl who went to see a passion play. She got so caught up in the story, when Jesus was arrested tears began to stream down her face. When he was tortured she began to weep, and as he twisted in agony on the cross she began to sob. Finally someone turned to her and said, “Don’t cry. It’s just a play. It’s only a story.”

But it wasn’t. It was the road to life… for all of us.

Posted in Blogs | Leave a comment

Not the Way It’s Supposed to Be

Romans 7: 14-25
Second Sunday of Lent (B), March 1, 2015

About 40 years ago, the eminent psychologist Karl Menninger wrote a book entitled Whatever Happened to Sin? He argued that whereas an earlier generation had a clear understanding of sin, the present generation was in danger of losing all sense of sin. In this volume he argued that over time we excused our actions as individuals by psychologizing them. We are victims of social pathologies, dysfunctional families, social programming, and cultural conditioning– giving us helpful insights into the dynamics of human behavior–but ultimately never fixing blame on individual choices and motivations that violate a moral code. But we know instinctively that there are deep flaws in the human species that can’t be explained away by the social sciences.

People titter when they talk about sin and it’s usually sexualized. Living in sin. Cologne called “Sinsational.” Chocolate as sinfully delicious. It’s often seen as “pleasurable naughtiness,” or indulgence. Rarely, if ever, does a public official when confessing to some act of malfeasance say, “What I did was sinful. I sinned against my conscience, the public trust, those who trusted me and my God.” But years after Dr. Menninger’s death, his question still remains: Whatever Happened to Sin? Is the concept dated, irrelevant, misunderstood, and embarrassing? A significant chapter in the Christian story and during the Lenten season is wrestling with and overcoming sin. That is the problematic for Christianity: how can a broken, selfish, and sinful humanity find peace with a Holy God? Why is the world such a mess?

Let’s look first at the range of definitions of sin found in the Bible. For such a small word, it’s packed with a lot of meaning. In the Lord’s Prayer, for instance, we say “forgive us our debts,” not only because we are indebted to God for the life, grace, and love we freely receive, but also we are in debt to those we have treated poorly or to those we have cheated. Another version is “forgive us our trespasses,” which means a boundary we have crossed. There are “sins of commission,” things we do, and “sins of omission” things we have not done that we ought to have done. The Bible describes sin as the breaking, or transgression, of God’s law (“Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact, sin is lawlessness,” 1 John 3:4). It is also defined as disobedience or rebellion against God (“Remember this and never forget how you aroused the anger of the LORD your God in the wilderness. From the day you left Egypt until you arrived here, you have been rebellious against the LORD,” Deuteronomy 9:7), as well as independence from God.

The original translation of sin was “to miss the mark.” When an archer shot an arrow at a target, the distance between where the arrow landed and the bull’s eye was called sin. So if the mark is “you shall not steal,” and you steal, you have missed the mark. If the mark is “Bear with each other and forgive one another” (Col. 3:13) and you grumble, gossip and are resentful towards someone you miss the mark.

But that sounds rather abstract, doesn’t it? We live in a world where we are acutely aware of sin whether our own or others, even if we don’t call it that. Francis Spufford, a wickedly iconoclastic and funny British pundit, wrote a marvelous book called Unapologetic: Why, despite everything, Christianity can still make surprisingly emotional sense. This former atheist describes sin as “The human propensity to foul things up.” He uses more colorful language, but this is a “G-rated” worship service. The short hand he uses for this state of affairs is HPtFtU. Spufford first points to those classic examples of adult failure: “when a marriage ends, when a career stalls or crumbles, when a relationship fades away with a child seen only on Saturdays, when the supposedly recreational coke habit turns out to be exercising veto powers over every other hope and dream,” p. 28.
But, he continues, it need not be so dramatic. It’s often more subtle.

“You’re lying in the bath and you notice that you’re thirty-nine and that they way you’re living bears scarcely any resemblance to what you think you’ve always wanted; yet you got here by choice…And as the water cools…you glimpse an unflattering vision of yourself as a being whose wants make no sense, don’t harmonize: whose desire, deep down, are discordantly arranged…The HPtFtU dawns on you,” p. 28

This was Paul’s dilemma and struggle in our passage today.
For if I know the law but still can’t keep it, and if the power of sin within me keeps sabotaging my best intentions… I realize that I don’t have what it takes. I can will it, but I can’t do it. I decide to do well, but I don’t really do it; I decide not to do bad, but then I do it anyway. It happens so regularly that it’s predictable. The moment I decide to do good, sin is there to trip me up.

So Paul says he can’t understand himself–this civil war within him, this battle between his will and his actions. He too knows the HPtFtU.
But let’s take a moment to turn the corner and look at sin from a different angle. Instead of looking at what God is against, let’s look at what God is for. The Biblical prophets knew that sin had a thousand faces and how many ways human life can go wrong. They railed against this because they knew how many ways human life could go right. They dreamed of a new age where human crookedness would be straightened out. The foolish would be made wise and the wise humble. The deserts would blossom, the rivers would run with Chardonnay, tears would be wiped away, and people could go to sleep at night without guns in their night stand. The poor would find justice and not mere compensation. Their lives would be fruitful and fair. Wolves and lambs would lie down together. All humans would be knit together and in harmony with nature. All would look to God, walk with God, and delight in God.

This is what the Hebrew prophets called shalom. This is God’s dream for the world. The word means “peace,” but it means much more. It carries the idea of health, wholeness and flourishing; of living in abundance. Land was capital in ancient Israel and part of flourishing meant having a sufficient plot of land upon which to farm, live, raise livestock and enjoy the fruit of your labor. Scratching out a living from the ground was never God’s intent. In this world the prophets described God would preside in the unspeakable beauty that all human beings long for and be drawn to instinctively to the mystery of God’s holiness which inspires all worship. In other words, this is the way things are supposed to be, as theologian Neil Plantinga puts it.

This is why God is opposed to sin. God is opposed to all that ruins shalom. God is opposed to anything that crushes human dignity, savages human relationships, and shatters human souls. God opposes unjust human structures that jail the innocent, pollute the land, make races into castes, laws that permit the strong to crush the weak, and indifference toward enriching human life. And God is opposed to the sin that ruins us.
What we see when we look around us is “not the way it’s supposed to be.” Fathers are not supposed to abuse their children. Corporations are not supposed to let toxic chemicals leech into water supplies. Politicians are not supposed to take bribes to do the bidding of a self-interested party. Adult children are not supposed to let their aging parents molder in a decrepit nursing home and surreptitiously steal their money. Cliques of cool kids are not to bully not cool kids to the brink of suicide. That’s not the way it’s supposed to be!

Richard Lischer, professor of preaching at Duke, tells the story of a young soldier on the Western front during the first world war, in the hell of the trenches, with shells exploding all around him and surrounded by the piled-up bodies of the fallen in a monstrous array, and he turns to a fellow soldier and says, “We weren’t meant for this”. I think this is a phrase that should echo in our minds and in our hearts as we survey the geography of our 21st century world. Every time we see a homeless person sleeping in a doorway: we were not meant for this. Every time we hear of a child dying of malaria, a preventable disease: we were not meant for this. Every time we see our terrible capacity for inhumanity when we torture and maim one another or a mad dictator mowing down his people before us in the paraded media: we were not meant for this.

Every time church folk do cruel and unusual things to one another: we were not meant for this. I’d like to think that some thought like that that motivated Jesus to heal that poor demoniac and every other poor person whose life was disfigured by disease or disability or injustice: we were not meant for this!

Sin is a parasite. Sin and evil are not anything in themselves but that they corrupt the good. Rot in a tree would not exist unless it destroyed healthy heartwood. Sin does not build shalom; it vandalizes it. I would propose that most of the evil in this world is perpetrated by other human beings. Yes, there are natural disasters but even there we build our homes so close to rivers that we destroy the flood plains and the water has no place to go but into our basements. With every good intention we send food to a third world nation only to have a dictator sell it to buy weapons. Thousands of German Lutheran’s turned over their Jewish neighbors to Hitler and his thugs. A mother spreads nasty rumors about a cheerleader who rivals her daughter for prominence. As Pogo said, “We have met the enemy and he is us.”

Most importantly: sin is not just a moral problem; it is a spiritual problem. When David confessed his adultery with Bathsheba and his consequent murder of her husband to cover it up, he said to God, “Against you, you only have I sinned and done what is evil in your sight.” (Psalm 51: 1-4). Sin breaks covenant with God. Sin smears a relationship with God. Sin grieves the heart of our Divine parent and benefactor. Sin is the betrayal of the partner to whom we are joined by a holy bond. We are blameworthy. We are guilty. Sin is a personal affront to a personal God.
So what do we do with this? Paul said that he couldn’t understand him¬self–this civil war within him, this battle between his will and his actions. I know it’s my story and I’ll bet it’s yours as well. He writes:

I’ve tried everything and nothing helps. I’m at the end of my rope. Is there no one who can do anything for me? Isn’t that the real question? The answer, thank God, is that Jesus Christ can and does. He acted to set things right in this life of contradictions where I want to serve God with all my heart and mind, but am pulled by the influence of sin to do something totally different.

In the next chapter, Romans 8, he also revealed his momentous, liberating discovery that “There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus…for God has done what the law…could not do…” No condemnation.

We’re free. No condemnation, for God has done for us what we can’t do for ourselves–namely, to take all the sin, suffering, death and evil of this world into and upon the Divine heart, to bear the consequences rejected love, and to enable us to stand before a just and holy God. We stand naked, stripped of all delusion and pretension, mask ripped off, standing before the Lord of all life and there is for you—wretched and conflicted one’s that we are and surprise!–no condemnation. No condemnation.

Posted in Sermons | Leave a comment